Updated refresh
Kelvin private working dossier
Incremental refresh for 20260531193022-d6337c. Checked recent deltas only; durable context changed because a new Calibrax Creador/CTOS loop surfaced and Challenger moved to a scheduled prototype demo.
2026-05-31 19:30 UTC
Decision
Updated
Watermark can advance. Dossier and control-plane files were rewritten.
Material new loops
2
Creador/CTOS prep; Challenger prototype demo.
CRM status
Offline
Twenty remains unavailable: TWENTY_API_KEY not set.
What changed
- Added Calibrax Creador/CTOS as a new active prospect/discovery loop from YC’s Jun 1 internal note: review call transcript/summary/prep brief before Friday Jun 5 10am; treat the CTOS plan as hypothesis-driven discovery, not a confirmed pitch.
- Updated Challenger from a vague internal follow-up to a scheduled Calibrax prototype demo on Jun 5 at 10am with Challenger attendees Julian and Jocelyn.
- Preserved prior Maxis, HSBC, EQT, Shipper, GetGo, and operational-alert context; no new durable IIMMPACT commercial change was found after the May 30 refresh.
What did not change
- Maxis postpaid bill collection remains proposal-sent / waiting on Maxis.
- HSBC PayNet remains meeting-held / follow-up unclear.
- EQT, Shipper, GetGo, Koomi, Everly, Finexus, Eastel, MCash, and Singer remain as previously represented unless later source data supersedes them.
- IIMMPACT operational alerts were treated as transient noise.
Active-loop updates
| Loop | Status | Next useful move |
|---|---|---|
| Creador / CTOS Calibrax prospect | Internal prep / discovery path. YC asked Kelvin and team to review a call transcript, summary, and Friday prep brief before Jun 5 10am. Current framing is discovery, not a pitch. | Read prep materials, pressure-test assumptions, and confirm whether Kelvin needs to attend or contribute technical credibility asynchronously. |
| Challenger-Calibrax Prototype demo | Calendar shows Jun 5 10:00am prototype demo with Challenger attendees Julian and Jocelyn plus Ling Hui and Kelvin. | Clarify Kelvin’s technical/demo role and prep prototype talking points. |
| Shipper + GetGo Upcoming Jun 3 | Both remain scheduled on Jun 3: Shipper affiliate management kickoff and GetGo intro to Calibrax. | Prepare concise Calibrax overview, discovery questions, and Kelvin-specific technical responsibilities. |
Source coverage
| Gmail | Google Workspace active for all three accounts. Searched broad and targeted Gmail deltas since 2026-05-28 across IIMMPACT, Calibrax, and personal mail; IIMMPACT broad search still hit a nextPageToken/page cap, but targeted searches covered named active loops. New meaningful signal was Calibrax Creador/CTOS; IIMMPACT post-May-30 mail was mostly automated ops/vendor notifications. |
|---|---|
| Calendar | Read events from 2026-05-28T19:45:32Z through 2026-06-14T19:30:22Z across all three calendars. Notable upcoming Calibrax events: Shipper and GetGo on Jun 3, Challenger prototype demo on Jun 5; no Creador calendar event was visible in Kelvin’s Calibrax calendar during this sweep. |
| Drive | Queried recently modified, starred, and business-name Drive files across all three accounts. No Calibrax Drive hits for Creador/CTOS were visible by filename; Gmail showed relevant Creador/CTOS attachments, but the available CLI did not fetch attachment bodies. IIMMPACT Drive recent_modified returned no new files; personal Drive changes were non-business. |
| Twenty | Unavailable: TWENTY_API_KEY is not set; unchanged from prior runs. |
Open questions
- For Creador/CTOS, does Kelvin personally need to review the prep materials and join the Friday discussion, or is he only copied for technical perspective?
- Calendar shows Challenger-Calibrax prototype demo at Jun 5 10am, while YC’s Creador/CTOS note asks for review before Friday Jun 5 10am; is there an actual scheduling conflict or just a prep deadline?
- Should Creador/CTOS be treated as a priority Calibrax prospect loop in future refreshes, or as background/internal prep until an external meeting is confirmed?
Read: Creador/CTOS is sensitive internal prospect context. It belongs in the dossier, not auto-saved memory, unless Kelvin explicitly confirms it should become durable memory.
Files updated
Reference dossier, company dossier, latest control JSON, memory candidates, changelog, refresh decision JSON, and this HTML report were updated in place.